From: Contentious population policy-making and its consequences: a health policy analysis
Subcategories | Categories | Theme |
---|---|---|
-Failure to on-time agenda setting of the population growth policies -Delay in timely shifting from birth control to population growth policies’ implementation -The politicization of population policy implementation -Relative comprehensiveness of the birth control policy programs | Incomprehensive and delayed implementation | Poor and biased governance in implementation |
-Disruptive bureaucratic processes in incentive policy implementation -Insufficient operational guidelines for population growth policies -Inadequate stakeholder engagement and coordination -Weak financial and infrastructure for performing incentive policies -Institutional fragmentation as a barrier to implementing population growth policy -The slow performance of the Ministry of Health in implementing population growth policies | Challenging institutional performance | |
-Weak governance in attracting community participation in the population policy cycle -Sociocultural duality of society-sovereignty in the implementation of PPs -Healthcare providers’ insistence on the implementation of population growth policies -Financial-technical conflicts in implementation | Top-down and conflicting policy process | |
-Negligence of essential ethical aspects in population policy implementation -Disregard of individual and public rights in policy execution -Ignoring unintended health outcomes of population policy implementation on community | The ethical and human rights challenge of implementation | |
-Absence of a monitoring and evaluation system in program implementation -Weakness in data management -Negligence of evidence for decreasing rate of total fertility | Ineffective monitoring and evaluation system |