You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 8 SWOT analysis table for case studies

From: Designing accessible and independent living spaces for visually impaired individuals: a barrier-free approach to interior design

Case study

Strengths

Weaknesses

Opportunities

Threats

So & So Studio

Central corridor spine minimizes disorientation

Requires high initial investment for customized tactile glyph system

Demonstrates potential for replicating intuitive design in future homes for visually impaired

Risk of underutilization if user preferences or habits change significantly

Tactile glyphs for wayfinding enhance independence

- Dependence on specific materials like porcelain and textured stone for functionality

Opportunity to incorporate smart home technology for further accessibility

Maintenance complexity due to unique materials and embedded patterns

 

Spatial continuity reduces learning time for new residents

 

- Design principles can inspire guidelines for universal design standards

  

Barn Home

Linear layout with minimal obstacles facilitates free movement

Limited adaptability due to fixed arrangement and material choices

Integration of more advanced lighting systems to enhance user experience

Structural design may not accommodate diverse user needs or preferences in future scenarios

Effective lighting strategy ensures privacy and reduces glare

Heavy reliance on natural light; artificial lighting options underexplored

Expanding courtyard design to include sensory gardens or wayfinding enhancements

Potential challenges with structural durability of lightweight materials

 

Combination of heavy and light materials offers tactile safety and visual balance

    

In-Habit

Modular design allows high customization based on user needs

Relatively complex system for initial setup and adaptation

Scalability for different housing needs, including public and community spaces

Dependence on the user’s ability to adjust to new sensory-based navigation systems

 

Incorporation of scents for wayfinding adds an innovative sensory dimension

Potential over-reliance on tactile and scent-based navigation may not suit all visually impaired users

Further development could integrate smart technology for real-time adaptability and navigation

Environmental factors could impact sensory elements (e.g., plant growth for scent cues)

 

Flexibility to adapt for various sites and environmental conditions

 

Creating collaborations with technology firms for enhancing prototype systems

Maintenance of modular system and plant-based sensory aids could pose challenges